Volume: 19 Issue-01 (January-June) 2024


NATIONALISM VS. GLOBALISM: A CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL DEBATE

Mohammed Raed Azzawi Alzaidi, Assist. Prof.Dr.Shamal Mustafa
Page No. : 1552-1562

ABSTRACT

The debate between nationalism and globalism has become a central theme in contemporary political discourse, shaping both domestic policies and international relations. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the ideological clash between nationalism and globalism, exploring their origins, characteristics, and political implications. The historical roots of nationalism and globalism are examined to provide context for their contemporary manifestations. Nationalism, with its emphasis on national identity, sovereignty, and independence, has been on the rise in many parts of the world. This resurgence is evident in the form of nationalist movements and leaders advocating for protectionist policies and tighter borders. Conversely, globalism, characterized by an emphasis on interconnectedness, cooperation, and shared governance, has been championed by international organizations and supranational bodies seeking to address global challenges through collective action. The article delves into the key arguments and perspectives of both nationalist and globalist ideologies, highlighting their divergent views on issues such as immigration, trade, and international cooperation. It examines the political, economic, and social implications of the nationalism vs. globalism debate, including its impact on domestic politics, international relations, and global governance structures. Through case studies and examples from around the world, the article illustrates the real-world consequences of the clash between nationalist and globalist agendas. It explores how nationalist movements have challenged the existing international order, while globalist initiatives have sought to promote multilateralism and global cooperation in response to pressing global challenges such as climate change, pandemics, and economic inequality. Despite the polarization inherent in the nationalism vs. globalism debate, the article also identifies opportunities for finding common ground and promoting cooperation between the two ideological camps. It argues that while nationalism and globalism may appear to be diametrically opposed, there are areas of overlap where compromise and collaboration are possible. In conclusion, the article emphasizes the significance of the nationalism vs. globalism debate in shaping the future of global politics. It underscores the importance of understanding the complexities of this debate and its implications for international relations and global governance in an increasingly interconnected world.


FULL TEXT